·

Rethinking Dieting: Researchers Discover Why Fasting Doesn’t Always Equal Fat Loss

发布时间:2024-08-27 19:01:29阅读量:161
普通文章
转载请注明来源

Scientists at Scripps Research have discovered that in Caenorhabditis elegans, a molecule produced in the gut during fasting travels to the brain and blocks fat-burning signals. This finding, which sheds light on the communication between the gut and brain, suggests that fasting may have benefits beyond simple calorie restriction. The study highlights the potential for new treatments targeting metabolic diseases by mimicking gut hormone actions.

Scientists at Scripps Research have identified a molecule secreted by roundworm intestines that communicates with the brain to reduce the rate of fat loss during periods of food scarcity.

In a scenario that many dieters can likely relate to, the less a Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) worm eats, the slower it sheds fat. Researchers at Scripps Research have now uncovered the reason: a small molecule produced in the worms’ intestines during fasting travels to the brain, where it blocks a signal responsible for burning fat during this period.

Although the exact molecule they identified in the worms has not yet been studied in humans, the new work helps scientists better understand the complex crosstalk between the gut and the brain. It also may shed light on why fasting—not eating for set periods of time—has benefits that are independent from the number of calories a person eats. The new study was published in Nature Communications on August 11, 2024.

“We’ve found for the first time that fasting is conveying information to the brain beyond just caloric withdrawal,” says Scripps Research Professor of Neuroscience Supriya Srinivasan, PhD, the senior author of the new study. “These findings make me wonder whether there are molecules made in the guts of other animals, including mammals, that explain some of the health outcomes associated with fasting.”

Brain-Gut Communication in Fat Metabolism

Researchers have long known that the brain controls the production and breakdown of fats in humans, other mammals, and model organisms such as C. elegans. In 2017, Srinivasan’s group identified FLP-7, a brain hormone that triggers fat burning in the roundworm’s gut. However, C. elegans do not have sensory nerves in their intestines, so scientists have struggled to pin down the reverse communication pathway: How does the gut signal the brain?

Scripps Research scientists discovered that specialized intestine cells (shown in green) in the C. elegans worm (gray) produce a peptide hormone that travels to the brain to control fat metabolism. Credit: Scripps Research

“We knew that altering the metabolic state of the gut could change the properties of neurons in the brain, but it was very mysterious how this actually happened,” says Srinivasan.

In the new work, Srinivasan and her colleagues removed more than 100 signaling molecules from C. elegans intestines, one at a time, and measured their impact on the brain’s production of FLP-7. They found one molecule that had a large effect on FLP-7: a form of insulin known as INS-7. In humans, insulin is most known as the hormone produced by the pancreas that controls blood sugar levels. But this insulin molecule was instead being made by gut cells and also impacting fat metabolism via the brain.

“When we first found that this was an insulin, we thought it was paradoxical,” recalls Srinivasan. “Insulin is so well studied in mammals, and there was no precedent for an insulin molecule having this role.”

Discovery of a Unique Insulin Function

However, when the group probed how INS-7 was impacting FLP-7-producing brain cells, they found that it was not activating insulin receptors—as all previously discovered insulin molecules do—but by blocking the insulin receptor. In turn, this blockade set off a cascade of other molecular events that eventually made the brain cells stop producing FLP-7.

“INS-7 is basically a signal coming from the intestines that tells the brain not to burn any more fat stores right now because there’s no food coming in,” explains Srinivasan.

Studies have previously shown that periods of fasting can influence the body in a variety of ways, but the mechanisms of those changes have been unclear. The new study points toward one way that an empty gut can signal the brain, which could potentially lead to a variety of health impacts beyond fat.

The new results, Srinivasan says, help explain how the brain and digestive system communicate in both directions to control metabolism based on the availability of food. More research is needed to uncover which specific pathways are involved in new gut-to-brain signals in mammals.

Compounds that mimic gut hormones—such as semaglutide, commonly known under brand names such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelus—have recently emerged as popular ways to control obesity and diabetes, so new gut peptides could add to this drug class. Srinivasan is also planning experiments to probe how C. elegans gut cells are triggered to produce INS-7 during fasting and which types of brain cells are affected by the molecule.

Reference: “A homeostatic gut-to-brain insulin antagonist restrains neuronally stimulated fat loss” by Chung-Chih Liu, Ayub Khan, Nicolas Seban, Nicole Littlejohn, Aayushi Shah and Supriya Srinivasan, 11 August 2024, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51077-3

This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01 DK124706 and R01 AG056648).

0 人喜欢

评论区

暂无评论,来发布第一条评论吧!

弦圈热门内容

Charles Rezk拓扑学notes:Compactly Generated Spaces

本notes主要讲的是拓扑学中$k$-spaces与$k$-Hausdorff space的相关概念,之所以保存这份notes是因为我当初学习高阶范畴的时候,刚好需要用到这些概念。比如说,无穷范畴的定义就需要用到他们:A topological category is a category which is enriched over $\mathcal{C}\mathcal{G}$, the category of compactly generated (and weakly Hausdorff) topological spaces. The category of topological categories will be denoted by $\mathcal{C}at_{top}$.而抛开它与无穷范畴的联系,仅仅考虑它在拓扑学本身的意义,我觉得这也是本拓扑学方面有趣的notes,不仅是因为有趣的概念如$k$-空间、$k$-豪斯多夫空间,还有紧致生成的空间,还包括一些有趣的结论。总之,对高阶范畴、或者更深入的拓扑学感兴趣的人,可以看看。

点集拓扑求救

以及有没有推荐的点集拓扑教材

我翻译了Wiki、nLab、Stack Project的部分条目,以及一些教材中的定义,全放到了数学百科中

一两个月前,网站浏览人数比较少的时候,我也比较空闲,因此花了一些时间翻译了国外Wiki、nLab、Stack Project的部分条目,同时,我还将一些教材中的定义以及少部分自己写的英文notes中的定义翻译成了中文。然后我将这些翻译好的内容全都放进了数学百科中。现在因为新建了好几个子圈子,我也陆续将这些词条分门别类放进了不同的子圈。我之所以会翻译这些东西,一来是因为中文互联网的数学资源属实是过于稀缺了,每个学数学的人想要更好的发展都离不开英语这一关。但是总有人对数学感兴趣却英语不好,这也意味着有一部分人会欣赏不了英文的一些美妙的数学。二是因为词条是可以插入到文章里的,这会方便看文章的人快速查看相关术语的意思,所以在弦圈里多放些词条不仅有利于网站内容更丰富,而且能让学习交流变得更加顺畅。下面我整理一下我具体翻译了哪些词条,其实也不是很多。主要问题是翻译数学内容本身并不耗时间,真正耗时间的是输入Latex代码😅,即便我写数学好几年了,Latex也早就熟练运用,但我还是感觉在写数学的过程中Latex的输入占用了过多时间。层预层局部赋环空间赋环空间概形凸秩$p$-可除群函数向量向量空间反同态 ...

陈省身微分几何经典教材《微分几何讲义》

一说到陈省身经典的微分几何教材《微分几何讲义》,就勾起我很多回忆。这本书是我初三时期入门微分几何的教材,虽然相比于Loring W Tu微分几何经典入门教材:An Introduction to Manifolds的教材没那么好理解,但是却比王幼宁的《微分几何讲义》更加的友好。我当时真的挺喜欢陈省身的教材的,虽然以我如今的水平看,当时的我并没有真正的看懂这本书,但这是我微分几何的启蒙书。我人生中看的第一本微分几何的书是王幼宁的《微分几何讲义》,但是我虽然很有兴趣,但却没能读下去,因为开篇就直接看不懂。而陈省身的《微分几何讲义》至少我能读下去,不至于开篇就直接来那么难的东西,我也是靠这本教材知道了很多微分几何的重要概念。我到高一还在看陈省身这本教材,直到后来高二为了读懂Jürgen Jost黎曼几何与几何分析教材:Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis,我不得不看自己当时嫌弃的Loring W Tu的An Introduction to Manifolds,才打开了新世界,原来还是这么好看的微分几何入门教材,Loring W Tu的书确实比陈 ...

初中生如何自学数学?

知乎提问:我想这样子自学数学?纯兴趣爱好。我想从高中数学开始自学,用教材帮这本教辅书自学。然后学完高中后整理一下初等数学的知识。是不是就可以开始自学高数了?现在我打开高数好多证明题和不等式都不会做。然后把高等数学,数学分析,线性代数,高等代数,概率论与数理统计,复变函数与积分变换,实分析,复分析,泛函分析,抽象代数,代数几何,长微分方程,偏微分方程,微分几何都学完。大致就是这样的人生规划,初等数学学透了是不是就可以理解学习高等数学了?我的回答:我觉得按部就班的按顺序学习没多大意思,我初三的时候是先把导数、积分这些高中最难但却是微积分最基本的概念“学懂”,然后才学别的比较基础的概念如集合。原因无它,就是因为当时这些更感兴趣。因此与其纠结于把什么学透了再来理解什么,不如换成先尝试理解什么,理解不了再来理解什么。我初三的时候除了学会了导数、积分、加速度这些高中数学、物理的概念,但也没太过深入。顶多再学了个正余弦定理拿来应付中考。我从初中开始养成的习惯就是,对什么感兴趣就直接学它,学不懂再看其他的,因此我初中的时候还直接学了范畴的定义(只是看懂了表面的定义)。直到初三升高一的假期,我才买了高中 ...

失业、分配不平衡和结构性转变:人还能否“卷”过AI

白果/文 人类对AI,尤其是AI冲击社会就业与收入分配的担忧,其实由来已久。20世纪70年代至今,我们至少经历过三波AI发展的大潮。当一轮轮潮水退去,人们发现人工智能似乎并没有想象的那么厉害,不禁有了更自信乐观的理由。然而,这一轮AI的发展速度和能力似乎不可同日而语。ChatGPT(Generative Pre-Trained Transformer)及各种生成式AI工具的出现,使人类可以用自然语言的方式给计算机发出指令,这在很大程度上打破了某些专业壁垒。虽然当前AI生成内容在准确度、独创性上还有待提高,但替代人工、降本增效的能力显而易见。那么,此轮AI发展将冲击哪些职业,又是否会如乐观者期待的那样,带来大量新的工作?在尝试回答这两个备受关注的问题之外,笔者也试图分析AI带来的社会结构性转变,以及为了应对这些转变,个体和社会应作出怎样的努力。我们看到,目前AI工具的发展,可能会导致技术性失业、收入分配结构的恶化尤其是“极化”效应,加剧各种社会问题。而要想让技术进步更好地实现普惠价值,我们需对现有制度进行深入反思,尝试对社会系统进行革新和再设计。归根结底,技术的社会价值实现和进步方向最终 ...

叔本华:人类是一步一步地迈向死亡的存在物

丹麦哲学家齐克果(Sren Kierkegaard)说:「什么是诗人?一个不快乐的人:他把深层的痛苦埋在心里;但他的唇舌是如此形塑,以致从中经过的叹息和哀嚎,都成了动人的乐章。」诗人好像真的是比较不快乐。在一个诗人选择自杀后,我们一般都对之予以同情和理解,彷彿诗人们自我了结生命是可以谅解的。种种的思绪,不禁令人想起德国哲学家叔本华(Arthur Schopenhauer)对艺术和自杀的一些想法。叔本华向来以所谓悲观主义哲学闻名,不少没读过他的人也大概知道这点。所谓悲观主义,是一种以负面的角度去理解价值的方案。而所谓负面,又有几个面向。首先,叔本华说,人类是一步一步地迈向死亡的存在物,从这个存在特质去看,人类的存在目标和目的也就指向着死亡。「假如存在的目标是死亡,那为什么不能现在就死?」一位诗人或许正在如此提问。还不能马上就死。正因为人是「步向死亡」的存有者,人的存在处境便是动态的──就于现在的每一刻。因此,「现在」便有了独特的价值。就如他在《作为意志和表象的世界》(The World as Will and Representation)第一册中解释:真正的存在就只在现在。现在一直往过 ...

哲学家叔本华的《生存空虚说》

叔本华虽然是悲观主义者,但他的哲学思想很是值得现代人思索。作为哲学家的叔本华反对基督教并认为基督教教义虚伪,其真理是为受苦,叔本华思想深受印度教与佛教影响深远。但就基督徒而言会同意人生是苦,但非是受苦。有时悲观不一定会带来负向的思考,其实悲观者的心思较为细腻而敏感,对生活的体验也较深刻;悲观只不过是一种思想,一种观念。「人生是一种迷误。因为人的欲望是很复杂的也不容易满足,即使当时得到满足,那也只是一时的状态,很快的人又会有更多的烦恼」。——叔本华《生存空虚说》当人对于人生所要求多时就会很容易不快乐、不满足,而想要生活快乐实在很难,几乎不可能,能切切实实的明白这番道理,对人生的欲求就会减少。世界的脚步不停的在变,是一种持续性的历程,世界也绝不会因你而改变,它仍然无情的转动着。在生存空虚一文中:「人一生所追求的只是想象中的幸福。」事实上叔本华以一种虚无的论调,来思辨他对人生的看法,但有时想想,确是如同他所表述;人的欲望无穷大,当人类对人生开始想追求一切时,欲望就开始无法满足人心。在文中作者认为,当人认为生命是为了活下去,生命自然就有价值;但若是有其目标,就只是昙花一现般,最终还是等于无;也 ...

GTM242 Grillet抽象代数经典教材:Abstract Algebra 2nd

本次我分享的教材是GTM242——Abstract Algebra,作者是Pierre Antoine Grillet。本教材是我高中时期最中意的抽象代数教材了😄,当时的我看过好几本抽象代数的教材,包括国内的某本抽象代数小册子教材(已经找不到了,不知道扔哪了,记得封面是黄黑色的),最后还是GTM242让我真正学会了抽象代数。高中的时候我基本每天回家的路上都会看它,并且最后我还把它的纸质书从国外亚马逊买回来了。这本教材我个人感觉通俗易懂,挺适合喜欢代数的初学者。整本书先从最基本的二元运算讲到半群,接着才到更加抽象的群的概念。教材的整体节奏也是循序渐进,先群论接着环论,之后才是域论。讲完前面的基础概念后,才开始更加深入的话题,如伽罗华理论。本书内容可以说十分完备,而且例子也丰富,带有趣的配套习题。此书不仅可以用于学习抽象代数,还能用于学习交换代数和同调代数,完备得有些出乎意料,感觉把所有代数的重要基础概念都囊括其中。应该可以跟Serge Lang的Algebra相提并论。值得一提的是,Serge Lang的Algebra经常被推荐用于作为代数方面的词典,用于遇到不懂或者少见的代数概念时去查 ...

Atiyah:Commutative Algebra使用攻略

刷题刷傻了~这次是交换代数的经典教材,M.F.Atiyah,I.G.MacDonald的Introduction to Commutative Algebra,以下简称A&M。A&M在知乎上也很有声誉,基本是公认的交换代数入门书。A&M很薄,128页,我大概读了二十余天,习题全部刷完了,觉得相当有收获。难度有,但并没有想象中的大,我完全能接受。A&M几乎绝版了,不过可以去专门进口书店买到,打印也不失为一个好选择。说起来我本来打算把交换代数放在明年再读的,但恰逢我校大二同学开展了一个交换代数讨论班,用的这本书,并且我导也推荐我现在读,所以大概就是这时候读了。确实感觉时机刚刚好。A&M是写给上个世纪七十年代的三年级本科生的讲义,很多地方不经雕琢,自成璞玉。形式化风格很是明显,鲜有大段启发性的说明或展示动机,大多是定义,定理,命题,推论的罗列,很“干”。一些证明也比较简洁,用作者自己的话说,他省去了机械的步骤;但相对的,我觉得他重要思路都点到了,真正跳步的地方比较少。我很喜欢这本书,首一的优点,它很薄,且基本的交换代数都覆盖到了,第二,它习题非常优秀, ...