··
107
·
2024-08-27 20:04

个体账户超过5w真的会被监控吗?

个人账户一次转账超过5W并不会被银行或税务监控。那为啥每隔:“个人账户进账超过5万就会被税务一段时间,就会有人来渲染局重点监管”的谣言。“5W元标准”是怎么来的?

其一,《金融机构大额交易..管理办法》中提到,“当日单笔或者累计交易人民币5W以上现金缴存、现金支取、现金结售汇、现钞兑换、现金汇款、现金票据解付及其他形式的现金收支。”这一则是对超过5W的现金业务银行上报规定。单指我们持现金存银行或汇款或结汇,银行系统会上报,主要担心现金来源问题。

其二,《中国人民银行关于非银行支付机构开展大额交易..的通知》中要求:“当日单笔或者累计交易人民币5W及以上的现金收支,包括微信支付,支付宝等在内的非银行第三方支付机构需上报。”这一则是对第三方支付平台的上报要求,单指的是第三方支付平台中的钱。如果你用支付大额付款,付的是银行卡内的钱,则不在上报之列。这也是国家为了防止某些不法的人利用第三方平台从事违法交易。

从这我们就能看出来,现金或第三方平台的转账,自然人超过5W会收到银行系统的监控,并上报银行系统。但这仅仅是防止金融犯罪与非法交易而做的工作,与税务上无关系。税务与银行系统打通,也不代表它能够查阅这些数据,更不用说利用这些数据进行查税。

Add a comment
Comments

There is no comment, let's add the first one.

弦圈热门内容

Django change an existing field to foreign key

I have a Django model that used to look like this:class Car(models.Model): manufacturer_id = models.IntegerField()There is another model called Manufacturer that the id field refers to. However, I realized that it would be useful to use Django's built-in foreign key functionality, so I changed the model to this:class Car(models.Model): manufacturer = models.ForeignKey(Manufacturer)This change appears to work fine immediately, queries work without errors, but when I try to run migrations, Django outputs the following:- Remove field manufacturer_id from car - Add field manufacturer to carDoing this migration would clear all the existing relationships in the database, so I don't want to do that. I don't really want any migrations at all, since queries like Car.objects.get(manufacturer__name="Toyota") work fine. I would like a proper database foreign key constraint, but it's not a high priority.So my question is this: Is there a way to make a migration or something else that allows me to convert an existing field to a foreign key? I cannot use --fake since I need to reliably work across dev, prod, and my coworkers' computers.内容来源于 Stack Overflow, 遵循 CCBY-SA 4.0 许可协议进行翻译与使用。原文链接:Django change an existing field to foreign key

[antd: Message] You are calling notice in render which will break in React 18 concurrent mode. Please trigger in effect instead.

I'm getting this error when using MessageWarning: [antd: Message] You are calling notice in render which will break in React 18 concurrent mode. Please trigger in effect instead.Here is my code:import { message } from 'antd'; export default function Page() { const [messageApi, contextHolder] = message.useMessage(); const res = await fetch("/api/...", { method: "POST", }); if (!res.ok) { messageApi.error("Error! Fail to login!"); } return ( <Home> ... </Home> ) }

Get connected with us on social networks! Twitter

©2024 Guangzhou Sinephony Technology Co., Ltd All Rights Reserved