运动与健康运动与健康·

Is Coffee Healthy for You? New Research Reveals It Depends on Your Genetics

Publié à 2024-08-27 18:54:01Vu 29 fois
Article ordinaire
Réimpression Veuillez indiquer la source

Researchers have found that genetics significantly influence coffee consumption, linking it to various health outcomes, including obesity and psychiatric conditions. The study highlights the complexity of genetic and environmental interactions in shaping coffee drinking habits and health impacts.

When it comes to your genetics, the answer is complicated.

Coffee drinking is a heritable habit, and one that carries a certain amount of genetic baggage.

Caffeinated coffee is a psychoactive substance, notes Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Ph.D., an associate professor in the University of California San Diego School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry. She is one of an international group of researchers who compared coffee consumption characteristics from a 23andMe database with an even larger set of records in the United Kingdom. She is the corresponding author of a study recently published in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology.

Hayley H. A. Thorpe, Ph.D., is the lead author on the paper. Thorpe, of the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University in Ontario, explained that the team collected genetic data as well as self-reported coffee-consumption numbers to assemble a genome-wide association study (GWAS). The idea was to make connections between the genes that were known to be associated with coffee consumption and the traits or conditions related to health.

“We used this data to identify regions on the genome associated with whether somebody is more or less likely to consume coffee,” Thorpe explained. “And then identify the genes and biology that could underlie coffee intake.”

Genetic Influences on Coffee Drinking

Abraham Palmer, Ph.D., is also a lead researcher on the paper and a professor in the UC San Diego School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry. He said that most people are surprised that there is a genetic influence on coffee consumption. “We had good reason to suspect from earlier papers that there were genes that influence how much coffee someone consumes,” he said. “And so, we weren’t surprised to find that in both of the cohorts we examined there was statistical evidence that this is a heritable trait. In other words, the particular gene variants that you inherit from your parents influence how much coffee you’re likely to consume.”

Sanchez-Roige said the genetic influence on coffee consumption was the first of two questions the researchers wanted to address.

“The second is something that coffee lovers are really keen on learning,” Sanchez-Roige said. “Is drinking coffee good or bad? Is it associated with positive health outcomes or not?”

The answer is not definitive. The group’s genome-wide association study of 130,153 U.S.-based 23andMe research participants was compared with a similar UK Biobank database of 334,649 Britons, revealing consistent positive genetic associations between coffee and harmful health outcomes such as obesity and substance use. A positive genetic association is a connection between a specific gene variant (the genotype) and a specific condition (the phenotype). Conversely, a negative genetic association is an apparent protective quality discouraging the development of a condition. The findings get more complicated when it comes to psychiatric conditions.

Challenges in Data Comparison and Cultural Differences

“Look at the genetics of anxiety, for instance, or bipolar and depression: In the 23andMe data set, they tend to be positively genetically correlated with coffee intake genetics,” Thorpe said. “But then, in the UK Biobank, you see the opposite pattern, where they’re negatively genetically correlated. This is not what we expected.”

She said there were other instances in which the 23andMe set didn’t align with the UK Biobank, but the greatest disagreement was in psychiatric conditions.

“It’s common to combine similar datasets in this field to increase study power. This information paints a fairly clear picture that combining these two datasets was really not a wise idea. And we didn’t end up doing that,” Thorpe said. She explained that melding the databases might mask effects, leading researchers toward incorrect conclusions — or even canceling each other out.

Sanchez-Roige says the researchers have some ideas about how the differences in results arose. To begin with, there was an apples-and-oranges aspect to the surveys. For instance, the 23andMe survey asked, “How many 5-ounce (cup-sized) servings of caffeinated coffee do you consume each day?” Compare it to the UK Biobank’s “How many cups of coffee do you drink each day? (Include decaffeinated coffee)”

Beyond serving size and the caffeinated/decaf divide, the surveys made no accommodations for the various ways coffee is served. “We know that in the U.K., they have generally higher preference for instant coffee, whereas ground coffee is more preferred in the U.S.,” Thorpe said.

“And then there’s the frappuccinos,” Sanchez-Roige added, citing the American trend of taking coffee loaded with sugary additives. Palmer mentioned other caffeinated drinks, especially in the context of the UK Biobank, tea, none of which were included in the GWAS, which addressed only coffee. Palmer added that the GWAS demonstrates the relationship between genotype and phenotype is more different than the relationship between coffee and tea.

“Genetics influences lots of things. For instance, it influences how tall you might be,” he said. “And those kinds of things probably would play out very similarly, whether you lived in the U.S. or the U.K. But coffee is a decision that people make.”

Genetic and Environmental Interactions

Sanchez-Roige pointed out that coffee comes in a variety of forms, from instant to frappuccino, and is consumed amid cultural norms that differ from place to place. A person with a given genotype might end up having quite a different phenotype living in the U.K. versus the U.S.

“And that’s really what the data are telling us,” she said. “Because unlike height, where your behavior doesn’t really have much to do with it, your behavior and the choices you’re making in your environment play out in various ways. So the interaction between genotype and environment complicates the picture.”

The collaborators stressed the need for more investigation to unravel the relationships between genetics and the environment, focusing not only on coffee/caffeine intake but also other substance-use issues.

Reference: “Genome-wide association studies of coffee intake in UK/US participants of European ancestry uncover cohort-specific genetic associations” by Hayley H. A. Thorpe, Pierre Fontanillas, Benjamin K. Pham, John J. Meredith, Mariela V. Jennings, Natasia S. Courchesne-Krak, Laura Vilar-Ribó, Sevim B. Bianchi, Julian Mutz, 23andMe Research Team, Sarah L. Elson, Jibran Y. Khokhar, Abdel Abdellaoui, Lea K. Davis, Abraham A. Palmer and Sandra Sanchez-Roige, 11 June 2024, Neuropsychopharmacology.
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01870-x

In addition to the researchers noted above, co-authors on the paper from UC San Diego are: Benjamin K. Pham, John J. Meredith, Mariela V. Jennings, Natasia S. Courchesne-Krak and Sevim B. Bianchi, all of the Department of Psychiatry. Other co-authors are Pierre Fontanillas, of 23andMe, Inc.; Laura Vilar-Ribó, of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Julian Mutz, of King’s College London, U.K.; Sarah L. Elson and Jibran Y. Khokhar, of the University of Guelph, Canada; Abdel Abdellaoui, of the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Lea K. Davis, of Vanderbilt University Medical Center; and the 23andMe Research Team.

Mariela V. Jennings, Sevim B. Bianchi, and Sandra Sanchez-Roige are supported by funds from the California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP; Grant Number T29KT0526 and T32IR5226). Sevim B. Bianchi and Abraham Palmer were also supported by P50DA037844. BKP, Julian Mutz, and Sandra Sanchez-Roige are supported by NIH/NIDA DP1DA054394. Hayley H. A .Thorpe is funded through a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council PGS-D scholarship and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Fellowship. Jibran Y. Khokhar is supported by a CIHR Canada Research Chair in Translational Neuropsychopharmacology. Lea K. Davis is supported by R01 MH113362. Natasia S. Courchesne-Krak is funded through an Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship in NeuroAIDs (Grant Number R25MH081482). Julian Mutz is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London.

The datasets used for the PheWAS and LabWAS analyses described were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s BioVU which is supported by numerous sources: institutional funding, private agencies, and federal grants. These include the NIH-funded Shared Instrumentation Grant S10RR025141; and CTSA grants UL1TR002243, UL1TR000445, and UL1RR024975. Genomic data are also supported by investigator-led projects that include U01HG004798, R01NS032830, RC2GM092618, P50GM115305, U01HG006378, U19HL065962, R01HD074711; and additional funding sources listed at https://victr.vumc.org/biovu-funding/. PheWAS and LabWAS analyses used CTSA (SD, Vanderbilt Resources). This project was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06.

Section des commentaires

Pas encore de commentaire, ajoutez le premier.

弦圈热门内容

cover

原创文章被检测为AI创作,AI检测还靠谱吗?

自从GPT火了以后,网络上的AI内容就变得泛滥了,刚开始还能轻松辨别哪些是AI的(一眼AI),哪些是人写的。现在这一两年里,随着生成式AI不断深入人心,AI内容变得更加泛滥了,并且经过这段时间技术的发展,AI生成的内容越来越真假难辨😢😤,有些AI生成的内容需要仔细辨别才能看出端倪。更可怕的是,道高一尺魔高一丈😔🙁,所谓的AI检测技术发展远远比不上AI生成技术的发展。AI生成的内容跟人越来越像,甚至有时候比人写的还要好,而人写的内容呢,相对的也就越来越AI化了😅。因此目前的AI检测会出现把人写的认定为AI写的荒谬事情。这也就意味着潘多拉魔盒已经彻底打开,AI内容与人的内容的界限开始变得模糊,所有的内容都变得真假难辨,恐怕这样下去人会彻底活在虚幻的世界里😭。以下为AI检测的结果我们检测用的是为什么说外国教材好?国外教材与国内教材的区别与 Djano云服务器部署 uwsgi+nginx+https部署这两篇文章。使用GPTZero进行检测,其他检测工具就不列举说明了,感觉用哪个AI检测结果都不会有太大差别。其实是别的AI检测都太不靠谱了😄,Undetectable.ai感觉就无论给它什么结果 ...

[antd: Message] You are calling notice in render which will break in React 18 concurrent mode. Please trigger in effect instead.

I'm getting this error when using MessageWarning: [antd: Message] You are calling notice in render which will break in React 18 concurrent mode. Please trigger in effect instead.Here is my code:import { message } from 'antd'; export default function Page() { const [messageApi, contextHolder] = message.useMessage(); const res = await fetch("/api/...", { method: "POST", }); if (!res.ok) { messageApi.error("Error! Fail to login!"); } return ( <Home> ... </Home> ) }

逻辑回归算法介绍

逻辑回归是一种用于二分类和多分类任务的机器学习算法。尽管名字中包含“回归”一词,但它主要用于分类,而不是预测连续值。逻辑回归通过构建一个线性模型,并通过非线性函数将其映射到一个概率空间,从而实现分类。以下是逻辑回归的主要特点和工作原理:线性模型:逻辑回归首先构建一个线性模型。设 (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) 是输入特征,(w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_n) 是权重,(b) 是偏置,那么线性组合可以表示为: [ z = w_1 \cdot x_1 + w_2 \cdot x_2 + \ldots + w_n \cdot x_n + b. ]Sigmoid函数:为了将线性模型的输出转换为概率,逻辑回归使用sigmoid函数,也称为逻辑斯蒂函数。该函数可以将任意实数映射到0和1之间,定义如下: [ \sigma(z) = \frac{1}{1 + \exp(-z)}. ]输出概率:通过sigmoid函数,线性模型的输出被转化为概率。对于二分类任务,这个概率可以解释为样本属于某个类别的概率。例如,如果我们预测输出为1的概率是0.7,那么预测输出为0的概率就是0.3。 ...

cover

浅谈《天国:拯救》中的骰子游戏

原链接: https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/386924079?utm_campaign=shareopn&utm_medium=social&utm_psn=1806094671581167616&utm_source=wechat_session 正文:《天国:拯救》是由战马工作室制作的中世纪RPG游戏,根据1403年发生的真实历史改编。本作的故事发生在中世纪时,匈牙利之王与瓦茨拉夫四世内战的波西米亚,《天国:拯救》的故事是根据真实历史改编的。随着贤君查理四世驾崩,神圣罗马帝国陷入了战争、腐败与混乱。瓦次拉夫,查理四世的儿子,却沉迷荒淫之事而不理朝政。瓦茨拉夫不满的宗亲贵族最后只能求助于瓦茨拉夫的皇兄——匈牙利之王,西格斯蒙德。但西格斯蒙德最后采用了极端的方式,绑架国王,逼其退位,趁乱夺权,其率部队大举进攻波西米亚,并侵蚀国王盟友的领地。在这乱世中,铁匠之子亨利在城镇斯卡里茨和父母过着平凡而快乐的生活,但这平静生活被一群库曼人雇佣军所打乱,他们收到了西格斯蒙德的亲令,掠夺并烧毁了城镇,在这次混乱中,亨利是为数不多的逃过这场浩劫的幸存者 ...

宇宙的最终结局会是什么?宇宙命运结局的三种假说

宇宙是如何诞生的?这个问题一直吸引着人类的好奇心。随着二十世纪六十年代,宇宙微波背景辐射的发现,科学界普遍认为,宇宙起源于大约138亿年前的一次大爆炸。然而,宇宙的最终结局又是怎样的呢?这是另一个让人类深思的问题。自人类诞生以来,人们就对死亡充满了恐惧,因为死亡意味着失去一切,无论是美好的事物,还是别的东西,全都将趋于“虚无”。虽然人类对死亡非常恐惧和厌恶,但是它似乎是宇宙中的一道铁律,目前仍然没有破解和逃脱的方法。不仅地球上所有的生物都难逃灭亡的结局,就连宇宙本身或许也不是永恒存在的,它也许会在遥远未来的某天迎来自己的终结,这已成为科学界公认的事实。关于宇宙的最终结局,科学家们提出了多种假说。其中一个是“大撕裂”理论,随着科学的发展,科学家们又提出了另外两种关于宇宙最终命运的假说:热寂和大坍缩。本期内容我们就来聊聊这个话题。1. 大撕裂假说图片来自网络宇宙的命运一直是天文学家争论不休的话题。有些人认为宇宙将永远存在,而另一些人则认为它最终会走向毁灭。如果你是一个科学家,你可能会对宇宙的未来感到担忧。因为有一种假说告诉我们,宇宙的结局可能是一场灾难性的大撕裂!大撕裂理论认为,宇宙的膨胀 ...

物理学家打造史上最难迷宫:极易碎成微粒

代达罗斯本可以从英国和瑞士的物理学家团队那里获取灵感。他们从分形几何和国际象棋的策略游戏中汲取原理,创造出了他们所说的有史以来最难的迷宫。在英国布里斯托尔大学物理学家菲利克斯·弗利克的带领下,这个研究小组在阿曼-比克尔平纹图案中产生了被称为汉密尔顿循环的路线,创造了复杂的分形迷宫。他们说,这些分形迷宫描述了一种被称为准晶体的特殊物质形态。它的灵感来自于一个骑士在棋盘上的移动。“当我们观察我们构建的线条的形状时,我们注意到它们形成了令人难以置信的复杂迷宫。随后迷宫的大小呈指数级增长,且数量无限,”弗莱克解释说。“在骑士之旅中,棋子(向前跳两个格,向右跳一个格)在回到起始方格前只访问一次棋盘的每个方格。这是‘汉密尔顿循环’的一个例子,即通过地图的循环只访问所有站点各一次。”准晶体是自然界中极其罕见的物质形态,是固体中有序和无序晶体的奇特混合。在有序的晶体中 —— 如盐、钻石或石英 —— 原子以非常整齐的模式排列,并在三维空间中重复。你可以将这个晶格的一部分叠加到另一部分上,它们就会完美地匹配。无序的或无定形的固体是指其中的原子都是乱糟糟的,包括玻璃和一些通常在地球上找不到的冰。准晶体是一种 ...

cover

为什么说外国教材好?国外教材与国内教材的区别

首先,不是所有国外的教材都是好的,也不是所有国内的教材写得不好。但整体上看,绝大多数的国外大学教材,要比国内的要好,而国内的教材好的屈指可数。国内的有些教材往往写得更加冗长和复杂,让人看得云里雾里、似懂非懂。而且封面简陋,排版一般,给学生的体验不太好,编者可能心里并没有将学生放在平等的位置上。这里就不具体列举国内哪些教材不好了😅😅😅。。国外的教材,往往有精美的封面,内容写得清晰明了,有舒服整齐的排版,有的时候会配上精美的图片或图案。国外的教材给人的感觉是大制作,把学生放在重要的位置,阅读体验非常好。有些比较基础的教材,比如说微积分,看教材能感觉到作者想方设法让你能学懂,巴不得背你上去。老师的本职应该是服务学生,如果没有学生来上学,那么学校也没有开的必要了,老师也会丢掉工作。因此,国内外的教育环境差别,通过教材也能撇到冰山一角。以下以国外的《大学物理》教材为例:精美的封面舒适的排版精美的图案清晰详细的内容可见,如果我们上课的时候,能够用上这样的教材,也不至于这么苦逼来啃教材,而是享受阅读。然而,国外的教材大制作,价格往往比国内的教材要贵得多,一本教材换成人民币可能要几百块。但国外的网上教 ...