Field Theory

Published at 2024-08-20 14:57:43Viewed 17 times
未经作者授权,请勿转载

Definition 6.1. A field is a triple $(K,+,\cdot)$ consisting of a set $K$ such that $(K,+)$ is an additive abelian group and $(K\backslash\{0\},\cdot)$ is an abelian multiplicative group.

Example 6.2. $\mathbb{Q}$, $\mathbb{R}$, $\mathbb{C}$, $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$ are all fields. In particular, they are fields of characteristic 0.

Definition 6.3. A homomorphism of fields $f:K\rightarrow L$ is a function $K\rightarrow L$ such that $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$, $f(xy)=f(x)f(y)$, and $f(1)=1$ for all $x,y\in K$. A homomorphism of fields is an isomorphism if it is bijective.

Proposition 6.4. Every homomorphism of fields is injective.

Proof. Since there is no non-zero proper ideal of a field.

Definition 6.5. Let $K$ be a field. A field extension of $K$ is a field $E$ such that $K$ is a subfield of $E$. We denote this by $K\subset E$.

Example 6.6. $\mathbb{Q}\subseteq\mathbb{R}$, $\mathbb{R}\subseteq\mathbb{C}$, $\mathbb{Q}\subseteq\mathbb{Q}_{p}$ are field extensions.

Definition 6.7. Let $K\subset E$ and $K\subset L$ be two field extensions. A $K$-homomorphism $f:E\rightarrow L$ is a field homomorphism $E\rightarrow L$ such that $f(x)=x$ for all $x\in K$. A $K$-isomorphism is a $K$-homomorphism that is a field isomorphism.

§6.2. Fraction fields

A subring of a domain is clearly a domain. And we want to show that every domain is a subring of a field. This motivates us to construct the fraction field of a domain by ``adjoining inverses''. Let $R$ be a domain. We define a relation on $R\times R\backslash\{0\}$ by $$ (x,y)\sim(z,h)\textrm{ if and only if }xz=yh. $$

It is easy to check that the relation is an equivalence relation. Then we write $\frac{x}{y}$ or $x/y$ for an equivalence class of $(x,y)\in R\times R\backslash\{0\}$ and called it fraction. We denote by $\textrm{Frac}(R)$ the set of all equivalence classes. Next, we define addition and multiplication on $\textrm{Frac}(R)$ by $$ \frac{x}{y}+\frac{z}{h}=\frac{xh+zy}{yh}, \ \ \ \frac{x}{y}\frac{z}{h}=\frac{xz}{yh}, \ \ x,z\in R, y,h\in R\backslash\{0\}. $$

Definition/Proposition 6.8. Let $R$ be a domain. Then ${\rm{Frac}}(R)$ with the operations defined above is a field, which is called the fraction field of $R$. And there is a canonical injective homomorphism $$ R\rightarrow {\rm{Frac}}(R),\ \ x\mapsto \frac{x}{1}, $$ which shows that $R$ is a subring of the field ${\rm{Frac}}(R)$.

Remark 6.9. If $R$ is not a domain, but a commutative ring with identity, then we can construct the fraction ring in a similar process.

Example 6.10. If $R=\mathbb{Z}$, then $\textrm{Frac}(\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Q}$. Moreover, if $R=\mathscr{O}_{K}$ is the valuation ring of the field $K$, then $\textrm{Frac}(\mathscr{O}_{K})=K$. In particular, if $R=\mathbb{Z}_{p}$, then $\textrm{Frac}(\mathbb{Z}_{p})=\mathbb{Q}_{p}$.

Proposition 6.11. Let $R$ be a domain. The fraction field ${\rm{Frac}}(R)$ corresponds to a field $K$ whose elements are of the form $xy^{-1}$ for $x,y\in R$, i.e. there is an isomorphism $$ {\rm{Frac}}(R)\xrightarrow{\sim} K, \ \ \frac{x}{y}\mapsto xy^{-1}. $$

Proof. Let $K$ be a field containing $R$. So it must contain all elements of the form $xy^{-1}$ for $x,y\in R$. Clearly, the map ${\rm{Frac}}(R)\rightarrow K$ is a homomorphism. If every element in $K$ can be written in the form $xy^{-1}$, then we obtain the isomorphism as desired.



Let $f:R\rightarrow R'$ be a homomorphism of domains. Then we have a homomorphism of fraction fields $$\textrm{Frac}(f):\textrm{Frac}(R)\rightarrow \textrm{Frac}(R'),\ \ \frac{x}{y}\mapsto\frac{f(x)}{f(y)}.$$

Thus we can view Frac(-) as a functor, which assigns to each domain $R$ its fraction field Frac$(R)$ and to each homomorphism of domains $f$ a homomorphism of fraction fields Frac$(f)$, i.e. Frac(-) is a functor from the category of domains to the category of fraction fields $$\textrm{Frac}: Domains\rightarrow Fraction-Fields.$$

§6.3. Algebraic extensions and algebraic closures

Definition 6.12. Let $K\subset E$ be a field extension. An element $\alpha\in E$ is algebraic over $K$ if there exists $f\in K[X]$ such that $f(\alpha)=0$. And $\alpha$ is transcendental over $K$ if $f(\alpha)\neq0$ for all $f\in K[X]$. An algebraic extension of $K$ is a field extension $K\subset L$ whose elements are all algebraic over $K$. A transcendental extension of $K$ is a field extension $K\subset L$ if there exists $\alpha\in L$ that is transcendental over $K$.

Definition 6.13. A field $K$ is algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial over $K$ has a root in $K$.

Example 6.14. $\mathbb{C}$ is an algebraically closed field.

Definition 6.15. Let $K$ be a field. The algebraic closure of $K$, denoted by $\overline{K}$, is the smallest algebraically closed field that contains $K$.

Remark 6.16. The algebraic closure of $K$ is indeed not unique. But since all algebraic closures are $K$-isomorphic, we shall call "the algebraic closure" of $K$ rather than "an algebraic closure".

Example 6.17. $\mathbb{C}=\overline{\mathbb{R}}$ is the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{R}$

References

  1. [Lor]Loring W. Tu, An Introduction to Manifolds, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, NY, 2011.
  2. [Die]Tammo Tom Dieck, Algebraic Topology, European Mathematical Society, 2008.
  3. [Pin]Andrew Pinchuck, Functional analysis notes, Department of Mathematics (Pure andApplied), Rhodes University, 2011.
  4. [Bos]Siegfried Bosch, Lectures on formal and rigid geometry, volume 2105 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2014.
  5. [Gilt]Pierre Antoine Grillet, Abstract Algebra, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol.242, Springer-Verlag New York, 2007.
  6. [Har]Robin Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, Springer, New York, NY, 1977.
  7. [SP]Stack project authors, Stack Project, https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/, 2021.
  8. [Lia]T.W. Liang, Note On Arithmetic Geometry, available at  https://www.manitori.xyz/books/1, 2022.
  9. [Hilt]Peter J. Hilton and Urs Stammbach, A Course in Homological Algebra, Graduate Textsin Mathematics, Volume 4, Springer-Verlag New York, 1997.
  10. [Mac]Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Second Edition,Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Volume 5, Springer-Verlag New York, Tnc. in 1971.
  11. [Sten]Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex analysis, Princeton University Press,2003.
  12. [Rub]Rubí E. Rodríguez, Irwin Kra, Jane P. Gilman, Complex Analysis, In the Spirit ofLipman Bers, Second Edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, volume 245, SpringerNew York, NY, 2013.
Get connected with us on social networks! Twitter

©2024 Guangzhou Sinephony Technology Co., Ltd All Rights Reserved